Eight years of rumours, fan-casts and studio silence ended on a stage in Anaheim on Friday night, and it took about ninety seconds. Marvel Studios walked out the entire principal cast of its “X-Men” reboot at D23, put a date on it, and then handed the last name on the list to Adam Driver over video like it was an afterthought. It is not an afterthought. Buried in an otherwise straightforward casting announcement is a character name that tells you exactly what kind of X-Men film this is going to be, and most of the room did not catch it in real time.
Director Jake Schreier came out with Sadie Sink, who leads the team as Jean Grey — a role she has technically already started, having debuted the character in “Spider-Man: Brand New Day” before this film even had a cast list. Schreier is the reason to take this seriously rather than nervously. He made “Thunderbolts*,” which is the most recent Marvel film that actually understood the assignment, and he made it about damaged people rather than about a doomsday device. Handing him the X-Men, a franchise that has always been at its best when it is about being hated for existing, is the first genuinely encouraging decision Marvel has made about these characters.
Buried in an otherwise straightforward casting announcement is a character name that tells you exactly what kind of X-Men film this is going to be, and most of the room did not catch it in real time.”
Here is the full team as Marvel announced it. Sink is Jean Grey. Kit Connor plays Scott Summers, which is to say Cyclops, and if you only know Connor from “Heartstopper” you are about to watch a very charming young actor be asked to play the most joyless man in comics. Christopher Abbott is Professor Charles Xavier. Samara Weaving is Emma Frost. Inde Navarrette is Rogue. Maya Boyd is Storm. It arrives in theatres on May 5, 2028, which is a long wait and also, for a film this size with this much design work ahead of it, an honest one.
The Abbott casting is the one that will start arguments, and it should. Every screen Xavier we have had has been a man in his sixties or older — Patrick Stewart built the entire modern conception of the character, and James McAvoy played him young and got away with it because the film was explicitly an origin story. Abbott is 40. That is not a young Xavier easing into the role over three films; that is a Professor X who is roughly the same age as the students he is supposed to be mentoring. Marvel has decided the generational gap is not the point, and that is a bigger swing than any of the hero casting.
Then there is Driver. He appeared by video rather than in person and announced that he is playing Nathaniel Milbury, and it is worth being precise about this because half the internet has already skipped a step. Marvel did not say Mister Sinister. It said Nathaniel Milbury. In the comics, Nathaniel Essex is Mister Sinister’s actual name, and Milbury is one of the aliases he wears when he is working quietly inside institutions rather than monologuing at people in a cape. So Marvel has technically announced a man who does not exist under a name that only means something if you have read the books.
That distinction matters more than it looks. Announcing “Adam Driver is Mister Sinister” gives you a villain reveal and a poster. Announcing Nathaniel Milbury gives you a man in a room somewhere, doing paperwork, whom the audience is supposed to slowly work out. Sinister has never been a punch-up villain. He is a geneticist who treats mutants as breeding stock and plays centuries-long games with other people’s bloodlines, and he is specifically obsessed with the Summers and Grey genetic lines — which is to say, with two of the people Marvel just cast. Put Driver’s particular brand of quiet menace in that role and you are not building a fight. You are building a horror film about consent.
The rest of the roster reads like a deliberate rejection of the Fox era, and the omissions say as much as the names. There is no Wolverine on this list. There is no Magneto. Marvel has picked Rogue and Storm and Emma Frost and built the film around Jean, Scott and Xavier, which is the Chris Claremont core rather than the Hugh Jackman core, and it suggests a team book rather than a vehicle for one guy with claws. Whether that survives contact with a studio that knows exactly how much money Wolverine makes is another question entirely.
Weaving as Emma Frost is the pick we would defend hardest. Emma is a hard character to get right on screen because she is written as cruel and glamorous and genuinely ethical in a way that only makes sense if the actor can hold three things at once, and Weaving has spent years being underused in horror films that could not keep up with her. Navarrette’s Rogue arrives with the heaviest baggage of anyone here, because Anna Paquin’s version is the one non-comics readers still picture, and because Rogue’s power set is a curse that most adaptations soften. Marvel has a version of Rogue on its own animated slate right now who tears herself apart over exactly that, so the bar is set inside the building.
What nobody said out loud on Friday is how this film connects to the one arriving eighteen months earlier. “Avengers: Doomsday” is in theatres this December with what looks like a full complement of Fox-era mutants, and the Special Look that dropped the next morning has Ian McKellen bleeding and Patrick Stewart in the dark and a Cyclops on a burning field who is very much not Kit Connor. Marvel is running two X-Men rosters at once, on purpose, eighteen months apart. Somebody has to hand off, and December is when we find out how brutal that handoff is.
So this is the part where the goodwill has to survive the wait. Marvel has assembled a cast with almost no obvious dead weight, hired the one director on its roster who just proved he can make people care about broken characters, and quietly signalled through a single character name that the villain is a geneticist rather than a warlord. That is a smarter set of choices than the MCU has made in years. It is also two years out, which is plenty of time for a release-date shuffle, a rewrite, or a reshoot to sand the interesting parts off. We would love to be wrong about that.
What Do You Think? Is a 40-year-old Professor X a bold reinvention or the moment this reboot loses the mentor relationship that makes the X-Men work? Does announcing Adam Driver as Nathaniel Milbury rather than Mister Sinister tell you Marvel is playing a long game, or is it just a fancy way to avoid spoiling a third-act reveal? And can an X-Men film succeed with no Wolverine and no Magneto anywhere on the call sheet?
Catch up properly: every MCU movie and show in chronological order on our Timeline Hub’s MCU timeline.
See you on the next binge!
