Tom Cruise spent Saturday in the infield at Daytona International Speedway, standing beside a stock car wearing a paint scheme nobody has seen on a track in decades. Anne Hathaway stood next to him in a cowboy hat. There was no press release, no unnamed executive quoted in a trade, no carefully staged embargo lifting at nine in the morning Eastern. There was just Cruise, a camera and a date. “Days of Thunder” is getting a sequel, thirty eight years after the original, and Paramount has already nailed it to June 2, 2028.
Cruise looked straight down the lens and said “We’re coming out summer of 2028. Don’t be late!” Hathaway got the better line, and hers doubled as a production schedule: “I’m gonna have this baby and then we’re gonna make this movie.” She announced her third pregnancy back in June, which means the follow up to one of the most quotable racing films ever made is now officially waiting on a due date. Cruise did what Cruise does. He skipped the trades entirely and posted it himself.
Cruise did what Cruise does. He skipped the trades entirely and posted it himself.”
Here is what is actually confirmed, because a viral video is not the same thing as a production sheet. Cruise returns as Cole Trickle, the hotshot open wheel driver who talked his way into a stock car in the original. Hathaway is playing a NASCAR team owner and engineer, and no character name has surfaced anywhere yet. Jonathan Levine directs from a script by Will Staples. Cruise produces alongside Jerry Bruckheimer and Tommy Harper, which puts one of the 1990 film’s own producers back in the chair. Paramount is running it theatrical exclusive and has already formatted it for IMAX, Dolby Cinema and 4DX, which tells you exactly how much faith the studio has in the racing footage.
If you have not revisited the original lately, it is a stranger film than its reputation suggests. Tony Scott directed it in 1990 straight off “Top Gun”, working from a Robert Towne screenplay, with Don Simpson and Jerry Bruckheimer producing. The cast was loaded: Cole Trickle (Tom Cruise) sparring with grizzled crew chief Harry Hogge (Robert Duvall), team owner Tim Daland (Randy Quaid) writing the checks, neurosurgeon Claire Lewicki (Nicole Kidman) as the love interest, and Rowdy Burns (Michael Rooker) and Russ Wheeler (Cary Elwes) trading paint on track. It pulled $157.9 million worldwide against a $60 million budget. Critics were unkind, and it still sits at 38 percent on Rotten Tomatoes, but audiences handed it an A CinemaScore and Hans Zimmer’s score has outlived most of the reviews. It also rearranged Cruise’s life: he met Kidman on that set, married her that Christmas Eve, and stayed married until 2001.
So why now, after almost four decades of nothing? The honest answer is that somebody else proved the market first. “F1: The Movie” put Brad Pitt in a race car in 2025 and cleared $600 million worldwide, and the entire industry noticed at once that audiences will still pay theatrical prices to watch cars go fast if the sound mix is good enough. Racing pictures had been a punchline for years. One enormous hit later, they are a category again. Paramount is not taking a wild swing here so much as stepping into a door somebody else kicked open. There is a certain symmetry to that. “Days of Thunder” only got made in the first place because Tony Scott, Don Simpson, Jerry Bruckheimer and Cruise wanted to do “Top Gun” again with stock cars instead of fighter jets, riding the wave of their own previous hit. Thirty eight years later the sequel exists because somebody else’s racing picture cleared the runway. This property has never once moved without another film giving it permission first.


There is also the Cruise of it all. He is 64, he closed out nearly three decades as Ethan Hunt with the most recent “Mission: Impossible” in 2025, and he is visibly in the business of deciding what the back half of his career looks like. His next release is not this: it is “Digger”, an Alejandro G. Iñárritu disaster comedy landing October 2, 2026, where Cruise plays an oil tycoon named Digger Rockwell opposite John Goodman as the President. That is a genuine swing at something new. “Days of Thunder 2” is the other move, the one “Top Gun: Maverick” wrote the playbook for, and the BR team would be lying if we said we were not curious how a 66 year old Cole Trickle plays.
Hathaway is the part of this we find genuinely interesting. She is 43 and having an absurd year, with roughly five films releasing or shooting, including Christopher Nolan’s “The Odyssey” this past July, “The Devil Wears Prada 2” shooting in New York, and an adaptation of “Verity” where she plays the title role. She has joked publicly that she saw her own schedule and thought she was being punked, which is roughly the correct response to a year that contains a Nolan epic, a legacy comedy sequel and a Colleen Hoover adaptation. And note what she is not playing here. The 1990 film gave its female lead a stethoscope and a waiting room. This one hands her the team, the money and the engineering. Whatever else the sequel gets wrong, somebody in that writers room understood that the Claire Lewicki role does not work twice.

Not everyone took it well, and the loudest objection came from inside the original. Randy Quaid, who played Tim Daland in 1990, spent the weekend on X calling Hathaway “a leftist, woke, horrible choice” for the part, arguing that the NASCAR audience would reject her and that Kidman should have been brought back instead. Nobody from Paramount, Cruise or Hathaway has responded, and we would be surprised if anybody does. It is worth noting only because it is the one sour note in a reaction that has otherwise been delighted, and because it accidentally makes the counterargument for the film: a sequel that recast the doctor as the boss is a sequel that already decided it was not making the same movie again.
What Do You Think? Does a legacy sequel work when the original was the one everybody agreed was the lesser Tony Scott picture, or is a mixed reputation actually the perfect thing to remake? Is putting Hathaway in the owner’s box instead of the hospital the smartest structural change here, or does the film still need a driver rivalry to have any stakes at all? And after Ethan Hunt, is Cole Trickle a victory lap for Cruise or the start of him quietly working through his whole back catalogue?
See you on the next binge!
